My grammar sucks, alright. I'm not a native speaker so I'm kind of exused. You are also sometimes sloppy whith your expressions.
And I have read what you are saying and I still think it does not make any sense to me. The whole idea of monster albums is veeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeryyyyy subjective. To me neither of the albums you mentioned are any monster.(maybe nevermind was, yeah nevermind is monster, okay). I am not, though, one of those guys who only look for the newest indie band and try to be cool and stuff.
I really got pissed by what you said to aiwass about the pocket sized bands. In this respect let me ask you this question: Do you need to see some music on MTV, on the charts to actually consider it monster? Is that what you are saying?
Also, antother thing to consider -- these monster albums you mentioned are produced by some huge, monster producers. I guess Mike Clinck did AFD(I may be wrong about this one), Bob Rock did The Black Album, and Bouch Vig(?) I guess did Nevermind. Please have in mind that these guys know what they are doing, they know how to produce the music to be apealing to the mases. You have to be aware of that when you judge music -- indipendent bands at the same time do not have the oportunity to work with such names, to use the premium gear...
So yeah, there is really a lot to think about when discussing the monsterity(funny word) of an album. I guss we should leave that discussion, it's so subjective.
The world is loaded, it's lit to pop, nobody is gonna stop!